wtb saltist or saragosa

Hi Guys

I am looking at a new combo for high speen spinning off the rocks at quobba/steep on a pe4-6 rod

so far in my budget i have come across the shimano saragosa 18000F vs the Daiwa Saltist 6500 and I am having a tough time deciding the saltist has a better ratio 6:2:1 saragosa has 4:9:1 the saltist winds 134 cm per rotation and saragosa 104cm the satist has 30kg of drag and the saragosa.
On paper the saltist looks better with a faster retrieve but i have heard the sargosa may me tougher especially when my target species are mackies.
anyone used these and recomend one over another
thanks
rig


mako magic's picture

Posts: 5785

Date Joined: 03/08/05

for me i would go the

Tue, 2010-06-15 18:38

for me i would go the saragosa , alot stronger bigger line capacity

flangies's picture

Posts: 2558

Date Joined: 11/05/08

Just to clear things up i'm

Tue, 2010-06-15 18:48

Just to clear things up i'm pretty sure the saltist only gets up to 15kg, and the 30kg was a typo on the box.

Tough call this one actually, There is a big line retrieve difference there. Depends how fast you want to wind ^_^

The saragosa gets my vote for reliability. But it would be insteresting to see the weight difference between both reels.

Do you know what rod you are sticking it on? Might pay to see which one balances better as long days spinning may start to show fatigue if the rod is tip heavy etc.

Also what line class have you decided on?

Posts: 401

Date Joined: 03/01/09

30kg was a typo error,

Tue, 2010-06-15 18:56

30kg was a typo error, saying that 15kg is more then ample for what your doing.

if your fishing braid line capacity will be fine on both reels

as far as retrieval rate goes the saltist would be the way to go at 6:2:1

as far as quality goes both reels would be on par, for what you are doing the saltist would be the better of the two and im pretty sure they are a little cheaper then the saragosa

____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Posts: 2925

Date Joined: 27/12/06

the saltist is 200g lighter

Tue, 2010-06-15 19:11

the saltist is 200g lighter and according to the spec sheets holds more line of which i will be using 50lb braid. retrievel prob is the most important thing the rod will prob be a 8-10ft PE4-6 not sure on which 1 yet got a few i am looking at. price wise saltist is only about $20 cheaper from wat i have seen so far.
thanks for the feed back guys

Posts: 2925

Date Joined: 27/12/06

oh yeah the drag is 33lb

Tue, 2010-06-15 19:12

oh yeah the drag is 33lb fogot to convert that 1 which would make it 15kg

Paul_86's picture

Posts: 1449

Date Joined: 27/03/09

saragosa for me

Tue, 2010-06-15 19:32

Ive got both the saltist and the saragosa and i much prefer the saragosa. Alot smoother drag and mite be a litle heavier but also feels alot stronger. The saltist will still do the job sufficiently though.

SamC's picture

Posts: 2013

Date Joined: 30/08/06

90% of my fishing is high

Tue, 2010-06-15 20:31

90% of my fishing is high speed spinning...if i had a choice between high and low geared i know which way i'd be heading.

Especially for macks and tuna the faster the lure moves the more interest you'll get.

Saltist ftw!

____________________________________________________________________________

Cheers,

Sam

Webby's picture

Posts: 835

Date Joined: 24/09/08

I dont see why you would

Tue, 2010-06-15 21:12

I dont see why you would need even 15kg of drag for mackies unless sharks are a problem but in my opinion, as said, the higher retrieve rate would help working slices ect. good luck mate

____________________________________________________________________________

I live with fear every day... sometimes she lets me go fishing.

catchalittle's picture

Posts: 1875

Date Joined: 04/09/08

Ray and Annies tackle have

Tue, 2010-06-15 21:31

Ray and Annies tackle have the Saltist 6500 on special at the moment for $280

____________________________________________________________________________

Nathan

Posts: 2925

Date Joined: 27/12/06

cheers nath, they are that

Tue, 2010-06-15 21:48

cheers nath, they are that price on mo tackle also. Cambells will do it for $349 witha power knob. after googling this subject it seems it has been a pretty big source of discussion saltist v saragosa on alot of other fishing websites world wide.

Posts: 135

Date Joined: 11/04/10

or 2 of these

Tue, 2010-06-15 22:02

For that sort of money I'd be taking a long look at one of these and a spare reel for parts. Rock solid reels and the only change worth making is drag washers.
BTW they retail for $300ish each here......

http://www.fareastfishing.com/product.php?id_product=137

Posts: 1081

Date Joined: 30/03/08

Rigorously tested across

Tue, 2010-06-15 22:22

Maybe a smaller reel for spinning Steep/Quobba?

They can get heavy over a day of casting.

A Gosa 8000 or a Salty 4500 ?

____________________________________________________________________________

Angling tourism is worth $10 billion to the Australian economy - 90000 jobs; more than any sport; spread the word

Posts: 2925

Date Joined: 27/12/06

those okuma's look good,

Tue, 2010-06-15 22:27

those okuma's look good, however they dont match the cranking speed of the saltiga but are faster than the saragosa and cheaper

flangies's picture

Posts: 2558

Date Joined: 11/05/08

I guess it all comes down to

Tue, 2010-06-15 22:58

I guess it all comes down to personal preference, I hate to say it though but the faster line retrieve is a big difference. In other aspects of fishing not so much, but in high speed spinning off the rocks it makes a big difference.

Do what i'd do and buy both! (Love being single)

brenz's picture

Posts: 2182

Date Joined: 15/06/06

high speed spinning = high

Wed, 2010-06-16 13:40

high speed spinning = high speed reel you dont have to be the most inteligent person in the world to realise that maybe the saltist is gonna be the better reel in this situation..... as for strenght you will not break a saltist or a gosa . in this situation saltist hands down

brenz's picture

Posts: 2182

Date Joined: 15/06/06

and im pretty sure the

Wed, 2010-06-16 13:48

and im pretty sure the saltist hold a bit more line than the saragosa

jay_burgess's picture

Posts: 4648

Date Joined: 18/08/05

Agree with Saltatrix

Wed, 2010-06-16 14:45

I'd be going with a 8000 or a 4500.

Posts: 2925

Date Joined: 27/12/06

these are light enough for

Wed, 2010-06-16 19:00

these are light enough for me i do most of my surf casting witha penn 950 and a heavy rod. either of these reels weigh about a quater of that

Brucesta's picture

Posts: 1721

Date Joined: 29/05/09

I've got a 6500 Saltist for

Thu, 2010-06-17 10:50

I've got a 6500 Saltist for Popping and it works a treat and will handle itself nicely for your intended purpose but perhaps a 4500 would be more suited, i know it wears me out chucking the 6500 around in anger for a few hours

____________________________________________________________________________

Las Vegas - Rolling the dice and trying your luck. 1M+ Barra summer target. 100kg Black Marlin winter target

Posts: 2925

Date Joined: 27/12/06

i got the Saltist 6500, the

Fri, 2010-06-18 17:28

i got the Saltist 6500, the ratio will be better for my arm. 

Good on Cambells protackle they matched the price of 2 internet sites, quality fishing shop

brenz's picture

Posts: 2182

Date Joined: 15/06/06

good choice mate enjoy it

Fri, 2010-06-18 17:29

good choice mate enjoy it